With landlords living in their cars, RSA takes another swing at dismantling eviction moratorium

by

New York’s rent stabilized landlords are asking the courts
to stop the state enforcing its newest eviction moratorium.

The Rent Stabilization Association (RSA) has filed an
amended complaint and an application for a preliminary injunction in the United
States District Court Eastern District of New York seeking to stay enforcement
of the new law that was signed last month by Governor Kathy Hochul.

The New York eviction moratorium was first enacted last
December as the COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of
2020 (CEEFPA), and extended and amended last month with a Jan. 15 expiration
under New York Laws Chapter 417.

The state tweaked its original plan to extend the moratorium
when the Supreme Court said in August that it provided no way for landlords to
contest tenants claims of hardship to avoid paying rent.

But even with the amendment, landlords say the moratorium is an abuse of their rights.

JOE STRASBURG

“CEEFPA Part A and the new moratorium extension have
trampled on the due process rights of landlords, denying them access to and any
benefit from their property – and, in the process, has freed tenants from any
consequence for refusing to pay rent and has given them carte blanche to
overstay the expiration of their leases, even when their non-payment or lease
expiration began before the pandemic,” said Joe Strasburg, president of the RSA,
which represents 25,000 owners of over one million rent stabilized apartments.

Strasburg cited the suffering of RSA members including a military
veteran-single mother who is now homeless with her 11-year-old daughter because
she cannot claim her own property from nonpaying, holdover tenants. Another
owner is clinically depressed and suicidal because he can’t take possession of
his home and is owed more than $100,000 in back rent.

“The new moratorium extension stretches into a more than
year-and-a-half period for what Albany lawmakers originally sought to justify
as a ‘temporary pause’ on evictions during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic,”
added, Strasburg.

“This has resulted in thousands of small property owners
throughout the state having their personal lives and finances decimated by
their inability to remove nonpaying and holdover tenants, many of whom simply
stopped paying rent – even those tenants who never lost their jobs, including
thousands ironically working out of the very apartments for which they ceased
paying rent.”

The amended complaint is seeking, among other relief, a
declaration that the moratorium extension is facially unconstitutional in its
entirety under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution,
and a preliminary injunction and permanent injunction enjoining the
implementation and enforcement of the extension.

A spokesman for Gov. Hochul said, “We are confident that the
new eviction moratorium adequately addresses landlord concerns with appropriate
due process protections, including access to a hearing, requiring renters to
submit hardship declarations, and establishing a moratorium on residential
foreclosures, while continuing to protect tenants. Governor Hochul remains committed
to helping vulnerable New Yorkers who are still reeling from the financial
fallout of the pandemic, and we have no further comment on this pending
litigation.”

In August, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a provision of
the Moratorium that allowed tenants to self-report a Covid-related financial
hardship by filing out their own hardship declaration. The courts said that
precluded a landlord from contesting the case and denied him “due process.”

The state got around that court’s decision by updating the tenant
requirements. A judge can now rule on whether a tenant qualifies, weighing
factors such as loss of income or increase in expenses. If the judge sides with
the landlord, the eviction case can move forward; otherwise, it is postponed
until January.

(Visited 1 times, 74 visits today)